Enforcement of Bank of England Act 1694

This Early Day Motion was tabled by our Austin Mitchell MP on April 20, 2009:

David Taylor MP tries to turn its message into an Amendment to the Budget.

I had sent the Act to HM Queen who sent it to Downing Street, who sent it to the Treasury which has not responded yet. But, for the first time in her reign, HM Queen has seen the Governor of the Bank of England!

That this House, observing that the intention of the founding Act of the Bank of England in 1694 was `that their Majesties’ subjects may not be oppressed by the said corporation’, notes that those subjects have been seriously oppressed by the Bank’s failure to control the greed, risk-taking and speculation of the banking system over which it presides; and therefore suggests that this oppression should be dealt with as the Act provides by fines three times the value of the abusive trading.

The first MPs have signed. Will you get your MP to sign via WriteToThem?

In our observation, oppressions through banks are due to:

1. There is now only a limited number of qualified staff in every branch. In fact, what used to be professional training for a professional body, ACIB, has become a “School of Finance“.

2. The training in “banking” is limited. It consists only of “sales”.

3. There is now little responsibility in local branches.

4. Instead, all decision making has been centralised. This results in the decision makers having little personal knowledge of the client or a perspective about a business.

5. There is little comprehension of day-to-day business issues.

6. There is no realisation of the criticality of time or expediency.

7. There is limited knowledge of supposed Government support. As an example, the Small Firms Loan Guarantee Scheme (SFLGS) was reducing before the crisis.

8. Instead of joined-up thinking, staff are only box tickers and have no room for initiative.

9. MPs have very limited knowledge of the depth of the problems, even before the crisis.

10. Day-to-day business borrowing for “normal” clients has never been excessive. In fact, it was already very restrictive to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and often even obstructive.

About these ads

3 Responses

  1. I have visited your blog before. The more I learn, the more I keep coming back! ;-)

  2. THANKS, Susan!

    Enjoy!

  3. A Good post, I will be sure to save this post in my Clipmarks account. Have a great day.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 389 other followers

%d bloggers like this: