The Rothschilds want North African Muslims to borrow from Rothschild banks and pay interest at rates the Rothschild central bank decides:
they do not want them to be able to borrow from Islamic banks and not pay any interest.

The Rothschilds want Muslims to trade their present political oppression at the hands of brutal dictators for future economic serfdom under the control of banker Lord Rothschild.

“Becoming ecnomic serfs” is the purpose…

Douglas Carswell MP aims at Honest money and sound banking.

Hence he doesn’t address the problem of national or public debts, but little steps for little feet!

As an anti-poverty campaign, it is more pragmatic than the economic theories of Tobin Tax definitions or the political demands of the Attac network.

Supported by a coalition of 48 organisations, the Robin Hood Tax campaign spells out what the income should be spent on.

And in the spirit of our times, it uses Twitter and YouTube.

The video is set to private until the launch, which is set to 0.05am in parallel with the 0.05% tax that Robin Hood wants to take.

Updates are on this page.

The letter makes three points:

a) false documents are being used to file bankruptcy

b) wealthy individuals are being bankrupted for no valid reason

c) Bank of England accounts are being used as part of insolvency procedures.

The enclosures we provided consist of :

Evidence a: a false document

Evidence a: a false document to file bankruptcy

Evidence b: the cases of three wealthy individuals and references to Guardian articles about a fourth case the story of Patrick Cullinane

Evidence c1: cover page of a legal document of The Insolvency Service

Evidence c2: page 7 of same document relating insolvency accounts to the Bank of England.

Our aim is to group cases to change the law and to enforce the Bank of England Act 1694. This Act was written with the intention to avoid the oppression of Their Majesties’ subjects by the Corporation, i.e. the Bank of England.

Regarding the enforcement of the Bank of England Act 1694, Austin Mitchell has tabled Early Day Motion 1297 for MPs to sign, while we are publishing the blog EDM1297 for ‘cases’ to record their story of oppression.

The answer from the FSA is here and from the Bank of England here.

Dear John McFall MP

This is a belated clarification regarding myself in your letter to our Chairman Austin Mitchell MP of March 17. For I am not one of Austin’s constituents, but the organiser of a Forum that has been meeting in both Houses since 1998, as you will see on our archive site www.monies.cc. Thus it will become clear to you that my opinion is not a personal one, but that I promote the concerns of many.

In fact, our analysis is so significant that a human rights lawyer advised us to “go for Parliamentary scrutiny via the Treasury Select Committee”. Hence I’ve attended numerous Committee meetings and gave you a copy of Creating a World without Poverty by Nobel Peace Prize winner Muhammad Yunus.

The Committee has indeed received a number of our petitions, and we wonder when a democratic process might take them into account. However, the Committee not only set its own agenda, but also decides whom to invite for evidence. As a consequence, you are practising what my late husband would have called a “mutual adoration society”: you never invite anybody who has become a victim of the system, nor do you invite anybody who points out solutions to the systemic failures. Instead you invite those who are paid to “do the right thing”, but the reality is the exact opposite, also predicted by my husband who used to work for the Greater London Council.

For example: instead of tackling root causes, a “Ministry of Justice” has the job of supervising companies that make their living out of recovering monies from the injustice of banks having overcharged their customers. I speak from personal experience, should you require “evidence”.

More recently, you participated in a forum of the British Academy where the conclusion was that the crisis was “principally a failure of the collective imagination of many bright people to understand the risks to the system as a whole”.  What a way to wash the eyes of HM the Queen!

If the system of financial and political institutions was interested in solving the crisis that it created, then I wonder

• why don’t you take on board our submission to the Stern review Green Credit for Green Purposes?
• why don’t you organise an enquiry into the long-term development of the money supply, the National Debt and the percentage of Cash vs Credit in the economy as we request in Stop the Cash Crumble to Equalize the Credit Crunch?
• why don’t you recommend to your fellow participants at the British Academy the examples of the predictability of the crisis as cited by Dr. Thomas Palley, who obtained his economic degrees in Oxford and Yale?

My mum, who saved me from the bombings of Dresden, needs my care and attention now. Hence I cannot continue to come and admire your Chairmanship. But the web continues to allow us to communicate. So I thought I’d let you know how awareness of “the system” is growing and how there is room to save face, if only there was the political will.

In particular, I’d like to draw your attention to The Oppression of HM Subjects by The Banking System – via EDM 1297 and our related blog that cites cases of victimisation and oppression that anybody concerned should be ashamed of.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you consider a change of policy in your ways of inviting evidence.

With sunny greetings from Brandenburg, where I keep watching how capitalism rolls into the former DDR,

Sabine

_______

Organiser, Forum for Stable Currencies

– Room 14 – a foundation for change, for victims of our legal and financial system

– Enforcement of Bank of England Act 1694, an Early Day Motion for grouping cases of oppression to change the law

Stop the Crash Crumble to Equalize the Credit Crunch – 1st online petition targeted at the Treasury Select Committee – with 226 signatures and > 8,200 page views

Financial Fairness for Voters and Taxpayers, please! – 2nd online petition – with 41 signatures and > 1,400 page views

Money as Debt also known as Credit – blog about our core concerns – with > 7,600 views

In the Spirit of the Forum for Stable Currencies – newsblog with > 12,300 views

Political summary with > 2,500 views

Archive site with > 10,400 views

Expanding Dr. Yunus’ Sphere of Influence – Social Business and the Future of Capitalism – with > 19,400 hits

Currently:

Buschower Dorfstr. 16

14715 Märkisch Luch

T: 0049 33876 90166

M: 0044 7968 039 141

It advocates the enforcement of the Bank of England Act 1694 and thus puts the finger on the button of the banking system and its supervisory institution: the Bank of England.

The outcome of our Forum meeting on June 23rd was this new site that gathers complaints with a view to changing the law via Parliament as the highest Court in the Land.

Here are the statements made on the day:

Austin Mitchell MP, Chairman of the Forum for Stable Currencies, next to Brad Meyer who prepared and facilitated the meeting

Roger Lawson, Communications Director, UK Shareholders Association

Eva Adshead who made Case Law as a Victim of RBS and the Legal Aid Board.

David Taylor MP tries to turn its message into an Amendment to the Budget.

I had sent the Act to HM Queen who sent it to Downing Street, who sent it to the Treasury which has not responded yet. But, for the first time in her reign, HM Queen has seen the Governor of the Bank of England!

That this House, observing that the intention of the founding Act of the Bank of England in 1694 was `that their Majesties’ subjects may not be oppressed by the said corporation’, notes that those subjects have been seriously oppressed by the Bank’s failure to control the greed, risk-taking and speculation of the banking system over which it presides; and therefore suggests that this oppression should be dealt with as the Act provides by fines three times the value of the abusive trading.

The first MPs have signed. Will you get your MP to sign via WriteToThem?

In our observation, oppressions through banks are due to:

1. There is now only a limited number of qualified staff in every branch. In fact, what used to be professional training for a professional body, ACIB, has become a “School of Finance“.

2. The training in “banking” is limited. It consists only of “sales”.

3. There is now little responsibility in local branches.

4. Instead, all decision making has been centralised. This results in the decision makers having little personal knowledge of the client or a perspective about a business.

5. There is little comprehension of day-to-day business issues.

6. There is no realisation of the criticality of time or expediency.

7. There is limited knowledge of supposed Government support. As an example, the Small Firms Loan Guarantee Scheme (SFLGS) was reducing before the crisis.

8. Instead of joined-up thinking, staff are only box tickers and have no room for initiative.

9. MPs have very limited knowledge of the depth of the problems, even before the crisis.

10. Day-to-day business borrowing for “normal” clients has never been excessive. In fact, it was already very restrictive to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and often even obstructive.

Sterling Cash burning into smoke

Expert speakers will be advocating economic democracy through freedom from National Debt. They will address the monetary problems connected with the banking crisis and global recession, discuss solutions to the problems and put together a framework for change. The speakers are leaders in the field and include Lord Sudeley, Austin Mitchell MP, Derek Wyatt MP, Michael Grimsdale ACIB (Associate of the Chartered Institute of Bankers), Abdallah Homouda, political scientist, respected journalist and TV commentator.

The event is sponsored by Bartercard, the world’s largest trade exchange. Bartercard enables account-holding businesses to exchange goods and services with each other, saving valuable cash, without having to engage in a direct swap. Bartercard has created a new form of stable currency; the trade pound, which offers one solution to the economic crisis because it allows businesses to trade and grow without the need for cash or credit from banks. This is increasingly important as private banks have replaced money with financial ‘products’ and ‘instruments’ as a medium of exchange; replacing prudence with profits by accumulating toxic assets, packaging unsustainable debts and selling them on to unsuspecting buyers. As a result the banks are suspicious and unwilling to lend or trade with each other.

Please email sabine@3d-metrics.com if you want to attend.

Notes to editor

Cash (notes and coins) and credit make up the money supply. After the Second World War, 53% of the UK money supply was in the form of credit (debt) issued by banks at interest. Now that figure stands at 97%. By making more and more money from credit (or debt) the financial economy is more and more disconnected from the real economy.

This is inherently unstable as the money necessary to pay for interest on credit is simply not there. That means virtually everybody is borrowing at interest to pay off interest as well as capital. The mathematics of compounding interest on interest results in a cycle of boom and bust. Because the money supply being is controlled by central banks, successive UK governments have tended to increase the ‘National Debt’ to fund growth or ‘fiscal stimulus’ packages, rather than make cut backs to repay the debt (unpopular with voters) or print money themselves. [See the Forum’s petition Stop the Cash Crumble to Equalize the Credit Crunch, asking the Treasury Select Committee to organize an inquiry into the money supply. More on http://tinyurl.com/666rwd]

Financial institutions are increasingly using legal enforcement to call in loans, cause bankruptcies, home repossessions, unnecessary litigation and even suicides. Through the national debt they also exploit and constrain the state’s budget, thus limiting political freedom.

The dubious benefits of unfettered market forces and a Western capitalist ideology have faced no serious opposition since Glasnost (openness) and Perestroika (restructuring) effectively brought an end to communism in the former Soviet Union. Even communist China has embraced capitalism; transforming its economy and becoming a global super-power in the process. It seems the world has made a collective decision to accept the inevitable economic losers as well as winners; deregulate and let the so-called free market work its magic… but now the market’s spell is well and truly broken together with the global economy.

At the recent G20 summit in London, the governments of the twenty most powerful nations on Earth decided to throw over $1 trillion at the ailing financial system. Along with previous commitments, this will take the total to over $5 trillion spent on propping up some of the biggest of those banks, institutions and financiers which have failed us so spectacularly.

Yet, instead of trying to paper over the deep cracks in the global financial system, we should aim to rebuild a more democratic and fairer global economy. Fresh thinking and a modern-day Glasnost (openness) and Perestroika (restructuring) are required for a capitalist world. Ushering in a second decade of meetings, the Forum for Stable Currencies will provide the platform for key decision makers to discuss the hows and whys of creating a better future.
rom